Self-criticism
A quote from this blog: Everyone had fun. But there is still somewhat of a cui bono aspect to the 2nd birthday, too, isn't there?"
A cui bono aspect, eh, Kris?
Whew. I must have been tired. Then again, I must have been tired on August 27, as the opening to that entry reads like bad Annie Dillard. Maybe I am really turning into a colossal bore. Too bad, now that Google is actually returning hits including this blog. People outside my small circle of frineds might actually read it! (The search engine presence was kind of cool, actually. I spent 15 minutes one day plugging unique combinations and seeing if my blog came up number one in the hits. I could never get my Estonian company website even recognized.)
Still, the policy for this blog is,
if it plays, it stays. I'm not going to go back and edit past entries. The guiding principle: whatever was written was simply an artefact of the moment. Shit, now I'm starting to sound pretentious again. I know what -- next subject. Something political.
****
Save the almonds And my soapbox stand for today is on the topic of nuts.
The US Food and Drug Administration is a really interesting agency. Besides doing much that is laudable to protect public interests, it has odd blind spots (such as allowing the synthetic neurotoxin aspartame in diet foods). And every once in a while the FDA gets hotted up over a non-issue. Like raw almonds.
Under a plan, one of those executive agency level plans that the public doesn't really get to vote on, all almonds legal for sale in North America are to be pasteurized. This is not satire. If it sounds odd and difficult and expensive to enforce, that is because it is, and apparently the process involves heating almonds with the use of a nasty chemical. But the FDA is determined to achieve full compliance.
The FDA's reason was apparently two salmonella outbreaks in the last five years. Oddly these outbreaks did not get much coverage while scores of people were keeling over from eating spinach. But the FDA is out watching for us. Spinach remains legal for the time being, but almonds will be banned. You can always toast a raw almond, but you can't uncook a cooked almond. These almonds will not be viable.
***
Sprouting things -- in order to release their Gaia-given energy -- is popular among health food people. I am definitely not on this bandwagon hook line and sinker. I'm largely an instinctovore who eats simple, fairly whole food that tastes good. (As a basic benchmark, a Twinkie does not for example taste good. If I ate them every day I might feel otherwise, which is the problem of many people problem in the case of too much salt and sugar.)
In 1999 and 2000 I worked in an office overlooking Charlottesville VA's downtown mall. My friend Tim, who is now a dietitian and whose home has at times in his life resembled the
Kam Wah Chung museum we will visit in remote interior Oregon, always brought in various goodies. I'm not talking about baked goods, but things like cardamom pods or pickled astralagus. Someone was for ever steaming or juicing vegetables in the kitchen area. Sometimes it seemed like more of a smart shop or cafe than a digital editing business, like we were on a course not just to transcribe the complete works of Locke and Bentham but also be completely detoxified with superb deep-immune functioning by the end of the project.
Sprouted almonds were one of Tim's offerings. I remember the episode clearly because it is one of the few things that I have pretended to eat and surreptitiously spit out. Judging from the flavor, I could not believe they would not contain a fatal amount of cyanide; it was overpowering.
One of the deepest cultural prejudices we have is that cooked -- roasted, browned -- food tastes good. Raw and sprouted food is a more difficult sell. In the case of barley, I agree whole-heartedly. Sprout away. Malt the stuff. Mung beans are tasty sprouted. But most things, no. I am not a fan of sprouted almonds.
**
Almond pasteurization seems perfectly set up to be the stuff of jokes. You got as the main opponents of the plan a radical contingent that many mainstream people like to put down as hippies or worse. And after all, It got up to 108 in parts of California in August. (The person we are going to visit near Pasadena raises chickens, and most of them died in the heat wave). The almonds there are probably already naturally pasteurized right on the vine, or whatever they grow on, right? Ha-ha.
But unfortunately it is a part of a larger serious issue that ties in to many things: consumer choice and paternalist attitudes on the part of the government. Variety is not actually increasing. It is an illusion. The fact that our household can, and did recently, buy
green tea wasabi peanuts and
cashew trail crunch with raw cane juicefrom Costco is no indicator. Behind the esoteric ingredients there are still the same reliance on hydrolyzed protein/MSG and too much sugars as in other snack food. The wasabi has been overprocessed. Since food color has been added, who knows if it is really wasabi and not just Wasabi brand mustard or horseradish, custom-engineered for a national retailer.
We are really way backwards when it comes to nutrition in this country. Look at the Nutrition Facts label. With the exception of the de facto banning of trans fats, which was welcome and long overdue -- they had no place in food -- very litt has changed. We see things in terms of only a few individual parameters. Usually it doesn't matter. The four "elements" on the labels -- Iron, Vitamin C, Vitamin A, Calcium -- are not unimportant.
Most people get by on the Amercan diet. Most people aren't sensitive to pesticides and their immune systems attack and destroy the occasional cancerous mutations that are always popping up before they can spread. So organic doesn't have such a direct impact on health.
Sure, we have a weght problem as a country, but most of us have strong genes, and our metabolism only finally conks out for good from all the corn syrup in our late middle age, and at that point we keep afloat with a raft of pharmaceuticals. And they work. They don't
really work, in the sense that they treat a complex problem complexly and get the body locked into a cycle of corrective feedback, as they should. But still, we Americans live close enough to the lifespan of people on islands like Crete, where most people still eat mostly real, living, unprocessed food that there is no sense of real urgency. Although our happiness index is far, far lower.
It is also easy and fun to deride nutritional research. You can't really fault people for doing so, because our media dumbs down the nuances of each story. Coffee appears to be bad for you one week then good for you again. Very few studies are expressly contradictory but it sure seems that way.
Actually, what no one has ever ever disproven is that a whole food diet is better for you than processed food. It is. Of course you have to know to avoid the leaf of the rhubarb plant and probably not everything that is raw is beneficial (potato). Making sure you fulfill the RDA of a few substances is all well and good. But if you want to be at your best -- productive, alert, healthy -- you eat high-octane, whole food.
But then you have retailers actually called Whole Foods making forays into all sorts of processed snack food and candy bars, and the distinction gets watered down.
There are tons of things in whole foods -- the uncapitalized kind -- that we are not even aware of, and certainly we are not aware of all of the interactions between them. We have a dim idea of things like lycopenes (especially in cooked tomatoes) and what they do. Enough to
conquer them -- synthesize them, package them in a bottle and sell them at prices that are far under a single heirloom tomato. Other things like reversatrol in wine we are only now isolating, though our whole thinking is already aimed at marketing it as a possible "fountain of youth". The French wine industry may go under due to global warming but we will be left with one red herring clue to eternal life.
There is a whole biosphere of micronutrients out there that is like the rain forest in terms of diversity, and we are hacking it down. We are losing ancient cultures by the minute. Some are being rediscovered (grains like spelt and kamut) and touted. But it is trees for the forest. To use another figure of speech, for want of a nail (sterility and zero deaths from food poisoning) we lose the kingdom (such things as raw-milk and cave-aged cheeses). I don't intend to eat a lot of raw-milk cheese or feed it to the children of the neighbourhgood. But I want to make responsible choices and not have to smuggle unpasteurized milk from Pennsylvania, as people in the DC area have had to do for years. The choice should be there.
***
Compulsory almond sterilization is not the end of the world. You can kill salmonella in mayonnaise-bound eggs without hard-boiling them. The pasteurized almonds will probably not taste that different. For most people, the banning of raw almonds may be like reading about the extinction of an exotic species in some remote forest. But you should be concerned. It is a major salvo in the sterilization of our diet. It is typical in that it is an fairly unnecessary requirement that favours large producers over smaller ones. The truth is that no organically grown almond has been found to have salmonella. So often it is the major economy of scale producers that develop a fatal quallty control problem. At that point it is easy to find a scapegoat -- dirty organic farms that use manure instead of good clean chemicals of course! But whether you want to sprout them or not, almonds should be available in their elemental form to people who want to choose for themselves. Slap a disclaimer on the package if necessary.